Spartanburg County Detention Facility

Spartanburg, South Carolina

Home > Jail Overcrowding

Spartanburg Herald-Journal

www.goupstate.com

Article published June 24, 1966

County Jail's Best Solution: New Building

FRED RIGSBEE, Staff Writer

Should Spartanburg County build a new jail?

A preliminary $2,000 study by Lockwood Greene Engineers, Inc., recommends this be given serious consideration.

The report, compiled at the request of a Delegation - Board of Control Committee, says in part:

"It is strongly suggested that much consideration be given to the idea of building an entirely new jail on county property somewhere outside the downtown area. This is recommended as a better solution to the overall problem based on the following comments:

A new one-story jail should cost less per square foot to construct than the proposed two-story addition; a one-story jail eliminates the problem of vertical transportation of prisoners between floors and would be safer for jailers and offer more security for the inmates; this solution would eliminate the problem of having prisoners escape in a downtown area. It also removes prisoners from close proximity to the public; the existing jail could easily be converted to usable office space for any future expansion required by the County Courthouse.

A jail located out of the downtown area would allow working of 30-day prisoners. One inherent problem which an out of town jail would present is the transportation to and from the courthouse for court proceedings. In this regard, several holding cells should be retained in the existing jail for this purpose.

This simple, straight forward layout which can be obtained in a new one-story scheme on an unrestricted area of land will prove to be much more suitable and efficient than either schemes A and B (improvements and enlargements to the existing facility)."

The Jail Study Committee, which is headed by Sen. Charles C. Moore, asked the engineering company to make two separate surveys. One deals with the renovation of the existing facility to improve its security and to prevent prisoners from shouting out the jail windows to passersby. The other proposes using the ground floor of the existing facility plus the addition to a two-story maximum security facility. Security of the ground floor would also be improved under the second plan.

Lockwood Greene Engineers estimates it would cost $397,187 to renovate the existing facility; and $1,171,334 to renovate the ground floor and make the 13,650 square foot addition as called for in plan two.

The first plan would reduce the facility's present accommodations of 110 prisoners to 102. An addition would provide accommodations for 120 prisoners.

According to the engineers, $397,187 would buy only a minimum solution to the serious problem of security, control and lack of certain spaces presented by the jail as it exists.

If the plan calling for the addition of a maximum security wing were adopted, it would then make the present second floor of the jail available for courthouse office space.

Ever since the jail was completed in 1958, it has presented security problems. Numerous studies have been made of the facility with the idea of providing it with greater security. Several months ago, steel plating was installed in some cells and bullet-proof glass now encloses the dispatcher's office in the jail.

Prisoners have escaped from the facility by digging out wall mortar with a spoon; pulling the construction blocks of the wall out by tugging on the plumbing fixtures; and one has even escaped by sawing his way out with hacksaw blades fished into his cell from outside the jail.

Some visitors stand outside the jail and shout to the inmates. The inmates shout back to the visitors. Courthouse officials often receive complaints from women at whom prisoners shout insults while walking past the jail.

Sen. Moore, who has not yet seen a copy of the report says he will call a meeting of the Jail Study Committee soon to consider the engineers' report and preliminary plans.

The reporter who notified Sen. Moore of the report quoted the estimated costs of the projects to the senator.

"You must be pulling my leg," the senator responded.